The Seven-Eyed Model of Supervision: A Guide for Coaches
The seven-eyed model of supervision gets mentioned constantly in coach training, then quietly skipped over the moment a coach sits in a real supervision session and cannot remember what eye four is meant to be looking at.
The seven-eyed model of supervision, developed by Peter Hawkins and Robin Shohet, structures a supervision conversation around seven distinct viewpoints: the client, the coach's interventions, the coach-client relationship, the coach's own process, the supervisory relationship, the supervisor's own process, and the wider context.
This guide walks through what each of the seven eyes looks at and how a supervisor moves between them in a live session. It sits alongside TPC Coaching Academy's broader guide to coaching supervision.
Where does the seven-eyed model of supervision come from?
Peter Hawkins and Robin Shohet first published the seven-eyed model in Supervision in the Helping Professions in 1985, developing it from close observation of what happens inside a supervision conversation across therapy, counselling and coaching. It has since become one of the standard frameworks taught on supervision training across the helping professions.
A later observational study of the model in practice found supervisors moving fluidly between the seven eyes rather than working through them in a fixed order, which matches how most experienced supervisors describe using it.
What are the seven eyes of supervision?
Each eye offers a different viewpoint on the same coaching relationship. A supervisor draws on all seven across an ongoing relationship with a coach, even when a single session leans on only two or three.
How does a supervisor move between the seven eyes in a session?
A good supervisor does not work through the seven eyes in order like a checklist. They follow what the coach brings and let the material suggest which eye needs attention. A session that opens with a coach describing a stuck client conversation might stay in eyes one and two, while the coach unpacks what happened and which interventions landed. If the coach then notices they feel unusually frustrated with this particular client, the session moves into eye four, and from there it often becomes clear whether that frustration is telling the coach something about the relationship itself.
The skill in supervision is recognising when a session has stayed too long in one eye and would benefit from a different viewpoint, particularly when a coach keeps circling the same content without new insight emerging. This distinguishes supervision from mentor coaching, which reviews specific sessions against competencies rather than moving across a wider set of viewpoints like this.
Why do eyes five and six matter most for spotting parallel process?
Parallel process is the pattern where the dynamic between a coach and their client shows up again, often without either person noticing, in the relationship between the coach and their supervisor. A coach who feels pressured to have every answer for a demanding client might unconsciously look to their supervisor for the same certainty, recreating the exact dynamic they are trying to understand.
Eye five focuses directly on that dynamic between supervisor and coach. Eye six goes a step further and treats the supervisor's own in-the-moment reactions, a tightening in the chest, a sudden pull to reassure, as data worth naming out loud rather than private noise to set aside. Supervisors who use these two eyes well often surface something about the client relationship that describing the session content alone would not have reached.
Supervision that works with models like this one, not only case debriefs, is what TPC Coaching Academy's Group Supervision programme is built around.